- Home
- Topics
- Improving performance
- Implementing the Recovery Act
- Transforming the workforce
- Collaborating across boundaries
- Contracting & acquisition
- Fostering transparency & democracy
- Managing finances & budgets
- Improving healthcare
- Conserving energy & the environment
- Using technology
- Strengthening cybersecurity
- New to government?
- Magazine
- Radio hour
- Reports
- Blogs
- About us



I find it rather strange that ERM would be targeted to the CFO and financial managers, particularly in the government context, since the most important risks are the "expected risk" of neglecting to provide value (not necessarily financial) to the citizen. Certainly, financial risk (of loss, or sub-optimal use of funds) is important; but, its consideration is useless if the funds applied fail to provide what is most needed for the citizen.
I think if the context of ERM in the federal space was understood then directing ERM to CFOs would be better understood. All agency heads are responsible for managing risks but all organizations also need champions of ERM. Agency heads cannot do it alone; alas the next most influential role in the organization would certainly be the CFO because of their visibility and influence.