Using Data: From Hammer to Flashlight

 

Using Data: From Hammer to Flashlight

Tuesday, October 31st, 2017 - 10:13
The recommendations by the recent Evidence-Based Policymaking Commission are a significant step towards creating a better supply of data for researchers and policymakers. But the next step is huge – getting the resulting data used.

The “use of data” step is complicated by two elements:  Who would use it?, and For what purpose?

Oftentimes, who the users of program evaluations and program performance data is unclear or overly broad.  It can range from citizens, different levels of government or elected officials, to appointed officials, budgeteers, program managers and even auditors.  And the potential uses of data can create tensions – are they used as a “hammer” for accountability purposes or are they used as a “flashlight” to shine a light on what needs improved and areas that excel and can be used as models for others? 

Background. Many areas of government do not have good data to work with, especially in terms of the impact of programs and policy initiatives.  However, over the past decade the domain of elementary and secondary education has matured significantly because of legislative attention and support for data collection.  As a result, this policy domain has made significant strides in creating a good supply of data.

However, moving to the next step – getting education data used – has proven to be a far more difficult challenge. Interestingly, a non-profit advocacy group – the Data Quality Campaign - was formed in 2005 to undertake a three-year campaign to “empower educators, families and policymakers with quality information to make decisions that ensure that students excel.”  However, 12 years later, the Campaign has found that this has been a much more challenging effort than it originally thought!

Over the past dozen years, the Campaign has made significant strides as both a resource for education information and as an advocate for its use. In addition, its approach can serve as a model for similar initiatives in other policy domains.

The Campaign’s Approach.   The Campaign summaries its evolution, with lessons and recommendations for others, in a report, “From Hammer to Flashlight: A Decade of Data in Education.”  It notes that its challenge was “getting people other than specialists to become passionate champions for the power of data to transform education into a personalized, results-focused endeavor.” It was launched in 2005 by a consortium of 14 advocacy and constituency organizations committed to creating a culture within the education community around the collection and use of data to “inform action and improve student achievement.”

As the national “voice” focused on education data policy and practices, the Campaign sponsored a series of user-friendly resources:

  • Show Me the Data. The Campaign developed a national snapshot of the findability and usability of education data in each state.
  • Scavenger Hunt for State Report Cards. States are required by federal law to develop a scorecard on the quality of their education system. The Campaign assesses whether each state’s report card understandable and how it compares to other states.
  • Bright Spots. The Campaign has prepared readable case studies of states that provide their education data in the most useful formats, and shows what these formats look like.
  • Building Roadmaps to Effective Data. The Campaign has prepared how-to guides for education professionals and parents to advocate for more effective displays and accessibility of existing education data in their states, school districts, and schools.

While the field of elementary and secondary education is rich with data, so are other policy domains – health, environment, transportation, and energy – to name but a few. And there are equally important uses for these types of data by citizens, such as traffic congestion management, reducing hospital-acquired infections, and managing peak electrical loads. There different degrees of maturity in these and other policy domains. And finding the data in non-technical formats is also a challenge for casual users.  However, there has been an effort to begin to build an overarching one-stop data hub that is compelling and easy to use, as exemplified by the nonprofit USAFacts.org, which draws on a number of different data sources.  But these efforts are only a beginning.

Lessons Learned and Advice to Others.  The good news in the performance movement is that Increasingly, the collection of data is less of a problem. The big challenges ahead center around analyzing, interpreting, and getting information used. The key may be increasing the "data literacy" of individual users.  This ties back to some specific actions that “performance geeks” can take, including:

  • providing timely data and analyses in a format that people can use to take action,
  • providing people the necessary training to use data continuously, effectively, and ethically, and
  • providing a forum for people to learn from each other, transfer knowledge, and share best practices.

It may be easy to describe what needs done, but in the end – as the Data Quality Campaign has found – it is hard to do and takes an incredible amount of persistence.

 

Image courtesy of Keattikorn at FreeDigitalPhotos.net