Putting Irregular Warfare in Perspective Preparing for the New Norm of Conflict

Declared wars start and stop, but the conflicts between nations and groups around the world simmer continuously and boil over frequently.

A stylized illustration features multiple translucent document icons layered over a gradient blue background. The documents appear to float, with faint white lines and geometric shapes adding a sense of depth and technology. No visible text, numbers, or recognizable brands are present in the image.

By

Frank B. Strickland

Senior Fellow Emeritus

IBM Center for The Business of Government 571-266-6003 businessofgovernment@us.ibm.com

Chris Whitlock

Partner

IBM Global Business Services cwhitlock@us.ibm.com

Declared wars start and stop, but the conflicts between nations and groups around the world simmer continuously and boil over frequently. Speaking to the Air War College class in 1992, then CIA Director Robert Gates said, “We must expect continuing radical change and upheaval around the world – at times promising, at times frightening – before the form and patterns of a new era settle into place.” Two decades later, it is not entirely clear what the form and patterns of this new century are.

Nevertheless, the development of policies, strategies, and instruments of power require U.S. and allied leaders to make some sense out of these still radically changing times. The Department of Defense (DoD) is considering a range of conflict types, including hybrid warfare —the combination of irregular and conventional methods of warfare. This is a logical consideration of what some nations may do to confront the U.S. with an irregular threat tightly integrated with conventional force operations. 

Photo Credit:  Public Broadcasting Service