- Radio hour
- About us
Wednesday, April 3, 2002
Mr. Lawrence: Welcome to The Business of Government Hour. I'm Paul Lawrence, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers and the co-chair of The Endowment for The Business of Government. We created The Endowment in 1998 to encourage discussion and research about new approaches to improving government effectiveness. Find out more about The Endowment by visiting us on the web at endowment.pwcglobal.com.
The Business of Government Hourfeatures a conversation about management with a government executive who is changing the way government does business. Our conversation this morning is with Major General James Jackson, Commanding General, U.S. Army, Military District of Washington.
Good morning, General Jackson.
Gen. Jackson: Good morning, Paul.
Mr. Lawrence: And joining us in our conversation is another PwC partner, Brian Dickson.
Good morning, Brian.
Mr. Dickson: Good morning, Paul.
Mr. Lawrence: Well, General Jackson, although most of our listeners have probably witnessed the ceremonies and events that MDW orchestrates, could you give us a sense of its roles and the responsibilities?
Gen. Jackson: I have three major missions. The first one deals with something we saw during 9/11, which is to respond to any crises or disaster or any kind of special security operation inside what we call the National Capital Region, which is just roughly a big goose-egg in and around Washington, D.C., Arlington, and the surrounding territory.
The second one deals with providing base operations support for five different installations that work for me, ranging as far away as Fort Hamilton, New York up in Brooklyn, and as far down south as A.P. Hill, Virginia.
And then the last one is the thing that most listeners might be most familiar with is the official ceremonial part of our business and public events which we conduct on an annual basis.
Mr. Lawrence: How large is your MDW team?
Gen. Jackson: I have a staff that is several hundred. And then of course the command across the board ranges -- is approximately around 7,000 people, split between military and civilian.
Mr. Lawrence: And what type of skills will these people have? You described such a range of activities. I'm curious.
Gen. Jackson: Well, I pretty much run the gambit of all skills. For example, I have operators whose job it is is to plan and control operations. Much of what you saw during 9/11 -- those people were involved with that. I have personnel people to keep track of people, both civilian and military, and take care of them.
I have a ceremonial staff that provides oversight and guidance as far as the events we do at both the White House, and then of course anything we do for the Department of Defense in and around the city. I have logistics personnel who deal with that part of the business. I have personnel who look at the garrison functions, or the functions that take place on a day-to-day basis on all those five installations.
And so I pretty much run the gambit. I've got lawyers to take care of the contractual issues and some what we call the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the legal part of our business. And of course, I've got Arlington National Cemetery and people like that. So it pretty much runs the gambit.
Mr. Dickson: Can you talk a little bit about what it's like to be a commanding general?
Gen. Jackson: I guess the first thing you say, it's great. It's good to be in charge. Most of us spend our lifetime in this business wanting to command and to be in positions where we pretty much are the senior authority in an organization. Of course, we temper that with understanding we all work for somebody. So we're not necessarily always the end to the food chain.
The job is a good one. It's fun to be part of everything that an organization does. And so, kind of as a CEO kind of person, I have my fingers pretty much spread across a little bit of everything that goes on in the command. While I won't be the most knowledgeable on any specific subject, I might be able to argue that I know a little bit about everything. And my job is to find out or know where the experts are who can give me that detailed information at the right time.
Mr. Lawrence: General, can you tell us a little bit about your career in the Army, some of your highlights that have brought you to this point?
Gen. Jackson: Sure. I come from a military family. My father served 33 years, World War II, Korea. And so he was -- I guess I grew up in a military family. And I respond to people who ask me where's my hometown, that I really don't have one. I've been all over the country.
I've served 30 years. Started out after graduation out of college serving in the 82ndAirborne Division, and then continued to multiple assignments with some Special Ops units and some -- with the Airborne forces, primarily in the light infantry side, which just means we do mostly walking or jumping and that kind of thing.
And through a variety of different command and staff positions, that has ultimately brought me to here. I've served overseas in Korea twice, across the United States in multiple different locations. I was checking the other day, by chance, and reminded myself that in 20 years of marriage with my wife, we've moved 13 times. So we tend to move a lot. And I have in the meantime been able to raise three daughters that are great kids.
Mr. Lawrence: Normally, we ask what drew you to public service, but I think you answered that by virtue of your family. But I'm wondering what kept you in public service. I can't help but imagine you had other opportunities throughout your career.
Gen. Jackson: I'm not so sure that public service itself is what I focus or I see the military as, to be quite honest. But the fact that I stayed in the military I think is an important one. And the fact that dealing with people tends to be something that is interesting and exciting.
I had it explained to me years ago that you can be in charge of things -- equipment -- and you'll see the same thing pretty much every day. When you work with people, you are always surprised, because people do so many different things.
And I have found working with people to be a really exciting part of the job. And so as a leader, my job is to interface with people. So that's what I do all day long, and that's what's been bringing me back to achieve a 30-year career.
Mr. Lawrence: Which jobs in your career have given you the most interesting challenges?
Gen. Jackson: Well, I'll be honest and say any time I've been in command, be it from the company level, which is about an organization of 150, up to regimental size, which is several thousand, and then into the job I'm at now, which is multiple thousand -- any time you're in charge of something, you draw more satisfaction from the business.
But I would tell you also that any time I've dealt with soldiers in the role of -- be it jumping out of airplanes or any kind of operations we've done, it has brought me great satisfaction, because of the things that they do and the way they operate, and the kinds of people they are.
And all you've got to do is turn on the TV any night and see the kinds of things that are going on in Afghanistan today and kind of recognize that. These young kids are just great, and 18, 22 years old. And the real challenge is be careful what you ask them to do, because they're going to do it. And you need to be right.
Mr. Lawrence: What were the positions or the events that trained you to be in command?
Gen. Jackson: Well, I think it's something that you gain by exposure and experience over time. Obviously, you know, you go through your formative years in college, you've got four years there. And then you start in the Army as a young second lieutenant, and you start to learn. You're a dry sponge, soaking up everything that comes across your path.
And you also learn by contact with other people. I would say that I am a composite of everybody I've ever worked for or worked with. I see things that they do that I like, and I steal them and I try and emulate those some way. And so I am a real composite. I couldn't really articulate any single thing that's mine; someone else's that I've taken on and decided that I think that's the right way to go about doing business.
Mr. Lawrence: Was the learning taking place at a technical level or a management level, a general management level?
Gen. Jackson: I think both. There is a tremendous technical side to our business that most Americans who have no Service experience probably have trouble comprehending. Many Americans, their only connection to the military is what they see on television or what they see in the movies. And I would tell you that the complexity of the operations, just as an example, the things going on in Afghanistan are surprising.
I mean, most people would find them to be daunting when you stop and think about trying to build an event that involves multiple things to try and happen all at the same time or very close together. And they're all mutually supportive. It gets to be a very technically demanding business.
From a management perspective, you're growing every day. If you aren't improving and growing and learning in everything you do, then you have no business being where you are. And I think any major CEO or CEO of any organization would tell you the same thing: he's learning every day.
Mr. Lawrence: Let me ask you about leadership. In your opinion, what are the top qualities of a good leader?
Gen. Jackson: Well, I think that's a very broad question. And I could give you a litany of answers. But I guess I would come back to things that have always stuck with me. And first of all, as a leader, I've always carried with me -- I've got two major responsibilities. One is to get my job done, and the other is to take care of the people who work for me, who are going to be accomplishing that work for me. And if you think about those two things in the way you deal with people, you really can't go wrong.
And I guess the third thing I would tell you, I label the trait, the character trait of the ability to adapt to change as being the most significant. And that's -- even how you adapt from one job to another, how you adapt when you're working for one boss and all of a sudden you get a new boss -- how do you adapt between being in a command position versus a staff position?
And how do you adapt to just change in your environment? 9/11 brought some changes to the way we live in this country. The question is, how do we adapt to deal with that change? Good leaders, great leaders can do that.
Mr. Lawrence: That's a good stopping point. Come back with us after the break as we continue our conversation with General Jackson of the Military District of Washington.
In our next segment, we'll ask him about the events of 9/11 and how they have affected his team and the challenges it's presented.
This is The Business of Government Hour.
Mr. Lawrence: Welcome back to The Business of Government Hour. I'm Paul Lawrence, a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers. And today's conversation is with Major General James Jackson, Commanding General, U.S. Army, Military District of Washington.
And joining us in our conversation is another PwC partner, Brian Dickson.
Mr. Dickson: General Jackson, can you talk to us a little bit about what you were doing on the morning of September 11th, and how your day progressed in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy of that day?
Gen. Jackson: Sure. Actually, we were in a staff meeting, so I was sitting at the head of the table with my entire staff. And my aide brought in a note to me, and indicated that an airplane had run into one of the Twin Towers in New York City, to which I read and discounted it as some wayward pilot who couldn't fly very well.
So we continued with the meeting. And then, shortly after, he came in again and said there had been a second plane, to which we indicated, or it was quickly obvious to us that coincidence didn't happen this way. So we cancelled the meeting and went and started watching the TV to see what had happened.
Shortly thereafter, someone came into the office and indicated there was a rather large smoke plume coming up from across the river, which is where the Pentagon is. So we walked outside the building and took a look, and sure enough recognized that this was something bad that had just happened over there.
We went back inside, talked about it a little bit, and then decided that we would change clothes, get into our go-to-business suits, the BDUs, battle dress uniform, fatigues, and take a ride over to the Pentagon. And that pretty much started the day. And we stayed at the Pentagon probably until about 10:00, 11:00 that night, went back to the office, got some sleep real quick, went home, got cleaned up, and went back to work about 3:00 in the morning.
Mr. Dickson: Can you describe the scene that you found upon arrival at the Pentagon?
Gen. Jackson: Yeah, sure. Well, obviously, we got there, and it was somewhat chaotic. And there was a lot of people moving about. There were obviously some people who were trying to apply some coherency to the situation. And they were pretty much gathering up a bunch of volunteers to assist in handling any casualties if they found them.
As we assessed the situation and linked up with the fire chief, who we were told was going to be the incident commander, I asked him what he needed and what we could do to help. And his first response was: "I need some manpower." Well, as it so happens, that's one of the things we can provide, and so we made some phone calls. And within an hour, we had brought some troops down.
The initial operations on the site was to apply some degree of coherency to what's going on, and the troops came in to backfill the volunteers. The volunteers weren't dressed properly, and their organization was rather loose, as you might imagine. Bringing in soldiers as part of organizations, I can line them up very quickly; I've got a chain of command I can deal with and I can control them better.
And it allowed us to allow the volunteers to go home, see family members, call family members and then to basically get back to work doing the things that they are required to do. An interesting note is that none of the military functions that go on in the Pentagon stopped. And so we freed those people up to go back to doing what they're supposed to do, and allowed us to do the work we were supposed to do. And basically was providing support to the fire chief, who was the incident commander at the site.
Mr. Dickson: Does your organization -- are you still involved in recovery efforts at this point?
Gen. Jackson: No, not as such. The recovery operations have stopped. As you know, the building's being repaired and fixed, and I'm being told they're ahead of schedule. The only thing we're still doing is we have collected some personal effects, both from the building itself as we cleared it, and also stuff that has been identified as personal effects from the individual remains that were retrieved from the site. And our job, the organization that works for me, is to identify those, catalogue them, and then make them available to family members in the event they wish to identify them and claim them. And that process is still going on, just because it's a very painstaking and detailed process. And we expect it to conclude somewhere this summer.
Mr. Dickson: In the aftermath of September 11th, how have you adjusted your priorities and your organization to meet the new challenges that the country faces?
Gen. Jackson: Well, the most significant that we're dealing with right now is the added security that we've established on all our installations. In fact, we started drifting towards that back in August, with the attempt to get back to controlling access to our installations, because they do house a lot of people, and some sensitive assets that need to be protected.
So we were well on our way. And so, since September 11th, we have just continued on that, and remained at the high level of alert that we're at.
The other thing that I would offer is more of a broad-brush approach. And that is to deal with change in itself. Obviously, since 9/11, lots of things have changed. And so as those things change, they cause other changes. And we have to deal with those on a day-to-day basis.
And those kinds of things are happening. Not just the security on bases, but other things that we've become more attuned to. You know, cyber security. We're talking about reviewing all our contingency plans, taking a look at them, seeing if we can improve some of our communications capabilities, and the other things that we might be able to do to make our response to something like this or something similar to this in the future, go better. And so that eats up a lot of our time.
Mr. Dickson: What type of planning or preparation pre-September 11th had you done for events like that?
Gen. Jackson: Well, obviously, we've got some plans. I mean, we go out and write some and we prepare them. But we can't write a plan for every eventuality. As a matter of fact, someone asked me after this if we had a plan. I said: "Yeah, we had a plan. But we didn't have a plan that talked about what we did if a plane flew into the Pentagon."
The interesting thing is we didn't need a plan for that. We took the plan we had, we modified it, and that's what senior people get paid to do, is to deal with those kinds of changes. And we executed the modified plan. And it worked exceptionally well.
Mr. Lawrence: Let me follow that up with another question about working together. You talked about working with the Arlington Fire Department. I know that the FBI and FEMA were involved. I wonder, you know, what the lessons are working across organizations like that?
Gen. Jackson: We had a great relationship with all the people and all the organizations that came in and worked at the Pentagon. I think the biggest lesson was that the system that's in place across the country, the Incident Command System that they have, the Federal Response Plan that is in place, is a good one.
In this case, inside the United States, the military does not take the lead. Even though that was military land in the Pentagon, the guy in charge of the operation was in fact the fire chief out of Arlington. And that's where I reported, and I worked for him, basically.
I asked him what he wanted me to do. And if he asked, and if there was something I could do for him, we provided it. It was a very collegial, cooperative kind of environment, and it works great.
As the fire chief slid out of that command role, because the fire was out and the structural damage to the building had been taken care of, the crime scene part came up, and then the FBI took over. No problem. I then start working for the FBI, doing the things they want me to do.
Once the FBI was done with the building, they turned it back over to us, and then we continued to do the things we had to do until we were complete, and then we gave it back to the Pentagon folks.
The value of the working across the interdepartmental and interagency work that we did was manifested by our relationship that we have established over time, because we live in the city, we work in the city, we know these people. We talk to them, we review our plans together, and we have a relationship.
That relationship is built on trust and on capability. We understand what each of us brings to the fray, and what things we should be able to do. And we don't look at doing someone else's job, we do what we can do best. And in this case, it worked out exceptionally well. The people that we worked with on 9/11 were just wonderful folks, and great leaders and great people in their communities.
The interesting thing is the relationships that we built have just increased in significance, in that we still talk to each other, go see each other, and spend time together. And that's what makes things work, is that interrelationships that we've built.
Mr. Lawrence: You've talked about the value of relationships. You obviously didn't begin building those relationships on the morning of 9/11. What were you doing before to build relationships with those groups?
Gen. Jackson: Well, interestingly, the Inaugural that we had for President Bush brought us all together, because of the significant event in Washington, D.C. and the kinds of stuff that happens there, the security aspects, the volume of people that come in, and the military participation, and the fact that we help prepare and plan the whole -- the inaugural, at least the parade portion and some of the rest of the stuff that is done.
We have to sit down and talk. And you go through a lengthy process of building a plan, executing it on a tabletop or on a floor, and then rehearsing it. And so throughout that event, over a period of several weeks, we become very close, and we get to understand.
So I know pretty much or have met every police senior member throughout the District, and certainly in the surrounding counties. Some fire chiefs, I've known. We train periodically with their own search-and-rescue people, because I have a search-and-rescue element. And they train together.
And so that's where we build those relationships.
Mr. Lawrence: That's a good stopping point. Stick with us as we continue our discussion about management with General Jackson of the Military District of Washington.
When we come back, we'll ask him about the challenges of managing Arlington Cemetery.
This is The Business of Government Hour.
Mr. Lawrence: Welcome back to The Business of Government Hour. I'm Paul Lawrence, a partner in PricewaterhouseCoopers. And today's conversation is with Major General James Jackson, Commanding General, U.S. Army, Military District of Washington.
And joining us in our conversation is another PwC partner, Brian Dickson.
Well, General Jackson, one of the things that I've always been most impressed about MDW is Arlington National Cemetery. Could you describe the management challenges one faces in operating a cemetery, or operating the cemetery?
Gen. Jackson: The biggest challenge with Arlington is space. We're fast running out of space. Where it sits geographically, it's bounded by a variety of different things. And so we're concerned that at some point in time, we'll just run out of ground.
We're building plans to be able to take us well into this century, beyond 2050, and a little bit further than that to be able to do the things we have to do. But there's going to have to be some other innovative ways to deal with it. And that's why we're building things like columbariums for cremation and so forth.
The other aspect is that we run anywhere from about 28 funerals a day, and average about 24. But we can go as high as up to 28. And we inter both Army and of course all the other services. Regardless of which service is participating, I could have elements of my own participating, depending on the level of the funeral. Depending on the individual veteran, there are certain honors that are rendered based upon what level that individual worked. And so we go through a fairly lengthy process to figure all that out so that we render proper honors for all of them.
But as you might expect, Arlington has a lot of emotion tied to it. And we deal with that as best we can, because we have families that are deserving of our attention at this point in time in their lives. As far as they're concerned, that's the most important thing that's happened at that point in time in their lives. And we deal with that.
Overall, things operate very smoothly. One thing I would pass on to all your listeners is that as a veteran, if you're out there, you need to make sure that your paperwork and stuff is available and properly set aside so when the time comes, your family is properly prepared. And there is a degree of paperwork associated with everything we do. And if you don't have that available, you can make things a little bit more difficult.
And there are ways to deal with that. All you've got to do is pick up the phone and call, and people can be happy to provide that information to you either through the veterans' services, or, of course, you can Arlington itself.
Mr. Lawrence: From personal experience, as well as talking to people who have been involved at a ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery, the response is all very, very positive. And so my question to you is how does it run so well? How does everything, with 20 or 28 ceremonies, how does it all work so well?
Gen. Jackson: Well, we've had lots of time to perfect that. In all honesty, we have had lots of time. And over time, the experience causes people to be able to find ways to make it better. Additionally, I would tell you that the young people and all the folks that we have working down there are focused keenly on that one event. And they take it very seriously.
The soldiers who participate in Arlington will tell you to a man that they are very proud to be able to provide that service to veterans who have served their country, and now they're paying their last respects. And so every time I've witnessed a funeral, I've never seen anything but a tremendous sense of dedication and desire on the part of everybody to render those honors properly. And it ranges from the very top down to the
lowest-ranking individual, to include family members who receive some honors.
Mr. Dickson: General, I know from my work with the Army that you personally, and also the Military District of Washington, has taken a leading role in developing innovative ways to managing your post infrastructure, including moving out into some innovative approaches in the area of privatization. Could you talk about what you're doing in this area?
Gen. Jackson: Basically, it's a fairly simplistic approach, but it's complicated as you get into details. The simplistic part is that the U.S. Army is good at many things. But some things we're not as good at as the private industry. And so the desire is to -- let's go get the experts to do the things that they're good at, and let's let us go back to doing the things we're good at.
And so running installations and providing utilities to an installation is not something you learn about in the Army. And maybe we ought to go out and find those experts. And so that's what we're doing. We're trying to bring them in -- all with the stated goal of being more efficient and effective with the dollars that the taxpayers give us.
Another example would be the Residential Community Initiative, which is RCI, in short. But it's just a fancy way of finding out how we can build new houses, or improve the maintenance on the existing housing that we have on our installations.
For example, the house I live in is 100 years old. Everything you do to that house is now historically based. And so it costs us money to be able to do that, and it costs more money than you might on a younger house.
But how do we go about fixing all this old infrastructure that in some cases we can't tear down because of the preservation and the historical requirements? And so we took at look at that, and the Army decided the best way to do that is to partner with private firms who build houses. And we pay for them by using the housing allowance that we receive -- if you own a house and you're living off the installation, you forfeit that when you move into government quarters.
Well, in this case, we won't forfeit it any more. We will take that money and pay the private contractor who has built the house. And they're contracting to do this, or building this partnership for long term. The one up at Fort Meade is a company called Piscern Real Estate, and they're tied in for 50 years right now.
So they see -- the novel approach here is, here's an American business that is not necessarily concerned with instantaneous gratification or profit. He is building his program to make money over 50 years. And he's partnering with the military to do that.
And so we are going to get newer houses, better-maintained houses while he gets a
long-term return on his investment, which is kind of novel.
Mr. Lawrence: You said it was a simple concept, yet it was hard to do. What's the hard-to-do part about?
Gen. Jackson: Well, the hard part is because it's new. No one's done this before. And so you're kind of groping as you go, trying to figure out how to do it. As you break new ground, it just causes new things to occur, and things that you haven't thought of necessarily.
There were some hurdles. There's legal hurdles; there's some political concerns. And there's also just the issue of how do we go about maintaining a relationship for 50 years with a private entity? You know, when was the last time the military built a partnership, a literal partnership, with a commercial entity? And so that's the difficult part, putting together the product or the process so that it produces the product you want and at the quality you want to give our people the kind of living standards that they deserve.
Mr. Lawrence: What are your special authorities as the commanding general of MDW?
Gen. Jackson: First of all, one of the extra functions I have is to function as the general court martial convening authority for all of the elements in and around the National Capital Region. What that basically means is when there's an infraction or some kind of legal problem, I'm the decisionmaker as to whether we take that to a court martial or we process it with another way.
So I will deal with all the military who work in the Pentagon and throughout the area from, again, as close as Fort Meade, Fort Belvoir and all the other agencies who, while they may not work for me, they will still fall under my jurisdiction for this.
The last time we counted, it's over 90 different organizations. The other interesting part that falls to me is we have elements of Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Coast Guard that also work in the Capital Region that have jobs similar to mine. And so what we do is we constantly interface with them so that we all know what each other's doing to try and facilitate the jobs.
Because again, in a crisis situation, we might very well need their assets to assist us, and so we work together.
Additionally, in the area of joint ceremonies, either at the White House or dealing with the Department of Defense, my organization takes the lead and all the others follow what we do. And they'll take instructions from us.
Mr. Dickson: As the commanding general for the Military District of Washington, you have jurisdiction over both Army soldiers and a large number of civilians. What are the significant cultural differences between these two groups?
Gen. Jackson: You know, that's an interesting question, because before I came here, I might have answered it a lot differently than I will today. I will tell you today that I find very little difference between good workers, be they civilian or military. I mean, good workers, good employees do things well, regardless of what clothing they wear and what their background is. They just want to strive to do well, and they'll do well.
Now, there's those that aren't so good, and then there's lots of differences with those. But I have not-so-good that wear uniforms sometimes, too. So, again, there's a commonality there that I don't really think transcends culture here. So I would offer that in my job, that the people I've worked with, both civilian and military, I've found to be very capable, able, dedicated. And they desire to do a great job. And therefore, there's really no difference between either one of them. And I'm blessed. I've got good folks who work for me, and those problems don't seem to take up much of my time.
Mr. Lawrence: That's a good stopping point. Rejoin us after the break as we continue our discussion with General Jackson of the Military District of Washington.
This is The Business of Government Hour.
Mr. Lawrence: Welcome back to The Business of Government Hour. I'm Paul Lawrence, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers. And today's conversation is with Major General James Jackson, commanding general, U.S. Army, Military District of Washington.
Joining us in our conversation is another PwC partner, Brian Dickson.
Mr. Dickson: General Jackson, I'm aware that the Military District of Washington is also playing a leading role in helping the Army improve its technology infrastructure and to develop more standard approaches to using information technology. Can you talk a little bit about your efforts in this area?
Gen. Jackson: The Pentagon has decided to take the lead, and to develop a program to do all those things you mentioned. Our part is to kind of be the test bed, or be a laboratory to take some of their ideas and actually put them into place and see how they work. We're a relatively small command as Army commands go. And so we can do that with a fairly small overhead, and we can see if it works.
The whole purpose behind it is to try and make our organizations more effective, more efficient by using not only common business practices, but also technology, by re-engineering the current technologies to give us the ability to get to information that is important and critical for us to make better decisions. And we're doing things like remoting our servicing capability for our computers. We have that capability now to basically reach into a computer and fix a software problem without ever having to send a service member down to touch the machine. It can be done from a remote site.
Looking at consolidating our information techniques, our ability to store information in a database so that it makes it available for more people to get to, so that you, one, know that information is available so you can go retrieve it quickly and make it go. And it's just a matter of trying to take all these tools and make them available to the decisionmakers.
Mr. Dickson: People who are technologists often talk about the introduction of technology changes organizations. And in many ways, they say that when they get rid of the middle managers, they flatten the structure because they're able to do the kind of things you just described. And I'm curious. Can you imagine that happening to the Army? It somehow seems counterintuitive to think that a structure that has lasted so long in history would change.
Gen. Jackson: I guess what I have learned over my 30 years is don't ever say never, because you'll probably be bit after a while. I think those kinds of changes are worth looking at and exploring. I think the Army has got ways to improve itself, and this may be one of them. My only caution would be we need to look at it and address it. And if we think it's going to work, then we move ahead.
And certainly our civilian and military leaders are taking a look at these things. I know General Shinseki is working hard to do what he's calling the transformation business, to transform the Army into a different organization that can better meet the nation's needs.
You know, if you don't change, to adapt, or adapt to the environment you're dealing in, sooner or later, you're going to become inconsequential or superfluous, and you'll go away.
Mr. Lawrence: What might be some of those differences? Does that mean different way that the members of the Army do their jobs, would it mean different type jobs? What?
Gen. Jackson: I think both those, certainly. Obviously, there's many different ways to accomplish the same role. And we should be looking for ways that are more efficient and more effective all the time. Some jobs will go away.
We've got new jobs today that weren't around 30 years ago when I came in the Army. One of the little vignettes I tell my people is just the PCs, the personal computers that we're dealing with today, there weren't in the Army 30 years ago. And today, when I'm standing in front of a big group, I ask them: "Is there anyone here who does not have a PC on your desk?" And no hands go up.
That has affected the way we move information. I mean, e-mail has taken away the old buck slip, the handwritten note. Very rarely do we do that anymore. Now, I do some because it carries a little bit of added weight sometimes. But the point is the routine way of transferring information now has become the computer.
Just take a look at your own organizations and ask yourself what happens when the computer goes down? What if the system breaks? You find out you're all of a sudden got lots of spare time on your hands. Because a tool has been taken away that you've become very accustomed to. And so that has changed. And that's just one example, which is not necessarily a big one, but it's been one example that has reached out and touched almost everybody in the military.
Mr. Lawrence: There's still talk about the coming wave of retirements of individuals in government. Is this a challenge to MDW?
Gen. Jackson: I don't think so. You know, we have been having people retire in the military for many, many years. In fact, it comes to all of us sooner or later. And we have procedures in place to deal with that. We have incentives, and we retain the people that we want to retain and that want to stay with us. And we have a program to do that. I think it's just the way we do business, and it's one of the things that we deal with every day.
Mr. Dickson: Sir, is MDW heavily involved in recruiting and the retention of soldiers? And what are you folks doing to try to improve recruitment and retention?
Gen. Jackson: Overall, recruiting has been a good story for the Army, although I personally -- my command -- does not get involved in recruiting initial entry soldiers, the first-time people coming in.
But my understanding is the Army is doing well across the board. And in the area of retaining soldiers, my command does do that, and we're doing very well. At this point in time, we're about 117 percent of our stated goals up to this point in time.
And we have a variety of different ways we deal with that in the way of incentives. Some monetary incentives; college education that can be provided through the GI bill; training choices. And the one that seems to pop up most readily in our command is the option to re-enlist, to stay where you're at. And about half of our re-enlistments that are retention of soldiers comes in that category, which means people are pretty much happy with what they're doing, and they're going to stay with us, or try to stay with us longer.
And so right now, that's all going pretty well for us.
Mr. Dickson: Do you focus a lot on improving or maintaining a high quality of life for the soldiers as a means for ensuring high retention rates? And what kinds of things are you doing in that area? style="font-WEIGHT: normal">
Gen. Jackson: We are doing things to affect the lifestyle of the soldiers. We've got some programs in place called wellness, and a wellness program that is designed to look at how you treat the whole family as opposed to just the soldier. We need to recognize that if the soldier's going home upset, or has a family life that's not doing too well, he's not going to be very good on duty.
Mr. Lawrence: What advice would you give a young person interested in the military?
Gen. Jackson: I would ask him to stay in school, learn all you can, be as good a student as you can. Remember that you're going to go through high school, like most of us, once. Get as much as you can out of that. And then if you have a desire to come to the Army, get yourself in good physical shape, keep yourself as morally straight as you possibly can, and step forward. But be prepared for challenges, and be prepared to face some things new in your life. And the Army will in fact bring those things out.
But we look forward to bringing on every young able-bodied American citizen who wants to serve. And I think there's a value added to every life that comes in and participates with us, because there's things we can do for them that probably are fairly unique.
Mr. Lawrence: I've heard about two programs. Perhaps you could tell me more about them, Twilight Tattoo and Spirit of America.
Gen. Jackson: Well, Twilight Tattoo is our summer program that occurs out on the White House Ellipse. We do it every Wednesday at 7:00. We're going to start April 17th, and we'll go to mid-July. And it's about an hour, hour and a half, or a little over an hour show. And it's intended to basically provide the viewer a snapshot of what the Army has done over time, and some of the assets that are available within MDW. But it's an historically based show that talks a little bit about the Army over the years. And then it also gives them an opportunity to see some of the more visible assets that are available to me and that we put on the show.
Some music. It's all built around music. We try to build it with some of the more contemporary music, which is rather difficult for an old person like me. But I've got folks who help me with that. And so the intent is to reach out to young people and to make it both an enjoyable but an informative event.
Spirit of America is really a large musical show that is done up in the MCI Arena. We'll be doing that 26 through 29 September. And what it amounts to, it's a patriotic version of any kind of a show that you might see. And it's again designed around the Army, and what kinds of things we've done or meant to the country, and what the country means to the Army. And it's put on by all our soldiers. I mean, there's no professional actors there. These are our people who are taught how to do this.
And we write the show from scratch, and then put it on. And we were going to do it last year. But as you know, with the 9/11 events, it was decided that we would cancel that event. And so we're going to come back this year, and hope that the public comes out and spends an evening with us or an afternoon with us, and hope they learn something, and also hope they enjoy themselves.
Mr. Lawrence: Well, those certainly sound interesting, but I'm afraid we're out of time.
Brian and I want to thank you very much, General Jackson, for being with us this morning.
Gen. Jackson: My pleasure. Thank you.
Mr. Lawrence: This has been The Business of Government Hour, featuring a conversation with Major General James Jackson, commanding general, U.S. Army, Military District of Washington.
Be sure and visit us at the web at endowment.pwcglobal.com. There you can learn more about our programs, and get a transcript of today's interesting conversation. Once again, that's endowment.pwcglobal.com.
This is Paul Lawrence. See you next week.