The Court listened to arguments on the 19th century Anti-Injunction Act, which bars a lawsuit from being brought forth until the tax has been actually levied. Essentially, the penalty imposed as part of the individual mandate on those who eschew health insurance will not go into effect until 2014, meaning a lawsuit could not be ruled on until 2015. Interestingly, the federal government, defending the individual mandate, does not ascribe to the notion of the penalty as a tax, therefore nixing a delay in the case.
The health care reform is very important to many americans who are currently uninsured. This health care reform is allowing hope to the one they claim at or below the federal poverty level. Personnaly, I do not see this being unconstituional, but a means of giving people freedom to choose to accept or decline the offer. States are not offering any alternative to the health care reform which means this plan needs to go forward. This new health care act can save many lives, protect students who currently in college with no coverage, children who fall between the cracks of getting health care. This is a administrative law, meaning more open meetings need to continue, more public participation and release more information to the public so they can make a desirable decision. I hope the justices consider the public interest and not corporations who oppose.